Movies: 1135
Comments: 67725
Members: 718
Online: 0 Guests: 262
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display.inc on line 1684.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display.inc on line 1684.
  • strict warning: Declaration of date_plugin_display_attachment::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 33.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 24.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 25.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 26.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 28.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 29.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 30.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 31.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_user::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/user/views_handler_field_user.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment_username::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 699.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 584.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 584.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_style_default.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 61.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 61.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/corona/public_html/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/corona/public_html/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/corona/public_html/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Declaration of content_handler_field::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/cck/includes/views/handlers/content_handler_field.inc on line 170.

Brangelina legal shennanigans

Posted by Daltons chin dimple on Friday, February 12, 2010

Apparently, according to somebody running a press tally, according to the UK press in the last 3 years Brad and Angelina have:

-Been married twice.
-Split 20 times.
-Brad's gone back to Aniston 8 times.
-Aniston has been over Brad 3 times.
-But she's been pining for him 16 times.
-She was pregnant with his baby last August (but she doesn't seem to be).
-Brad refused to have any more kids with Angeline, 5 months before she gave birth to the twins.
-He started to drink last January, and March and somehow again after Xmas.

So it is fair to say that nobody really knows what is going on and half of it at least is made up bollocks.

After all this they have decided to sue the UK Sunday tabloid, The News Of The World. Why are they doing this?

I am no legal expert, but an interesting point of law has been put forward. That it kills two birds with one stone.

As US law is so different, celebs have virtually no way to sue over gossip allegations in the USA.

However the News of The World is big enough and rich enough to be worth taking to court in the UK, and it is Murdoch owned so legal action is unlikely to upset that many people.

Here is where it get's interesting.

If they win in the UK, then the game changes as apparently in US law any US publications publishing these claims, proved in UK legal process to be false, would be deemed guilty of malice (defamation) and Jolie-Pitt could successfully sue for millions.

So not only do they stop the rumours, they also stop any future gossip. It also could rewrite the rule book about how US celeb gossip rags seemingly print what they want without any comeback.

Interesting.

The Swollen Goi...
Location:
Posts: 14343
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

The press seems intent on painting Aniston as the poor, slighted girl-next-door for whom things just never seem to go right. Poor, poor Jennifer Aniston. Brad left. Then Vince. Then that model guy. Then John Mayer. Then, possibly, Gerard Butler.

Maybe she's just an awful bitch guys can't stand to be around for more than a year or two. Maybe Bradley Pitt showed amazing fortitude by sticking with her awful bitch ass as long as he did.

But what do I know? I've never met the woman. I'm sure she's good people.

Corporal_Hicks
Location:
Posts: 1664
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

They're all blowhards.

Sent from Dalton's IPad.
Daltons chin dimple
Location:
Posts: 12800
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

It's all image. I imagine Jolie's "People" put a lot of effort into deflecting from the fact she stole another woman's hubby.

Ever noticed how she could be considered a sort of "Fame Succubus"? She attaches herself to a guy, then leaves him and kind of takes his fame and adds it to her own, elevating herself above him?

....says "Kill Bond, NOW!"
KingVoyeur
Location:
Posts: 1601
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

So she's Borg?

Honey bunches.....of death!
Daltons chin dimple
Location:
Posts: 12800
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

Never thought of it like that, but yes! She takes their fame and adds it to her own matrix!

....says "Kill Bond, NOW!"
Daltons chin dimple
Location:
Posts: 12800
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

Sorry, I became distracted. It was the point of law and what it may mean for the US Gossip journalist profession that could be worth watching here.

Isn't Ca. considering something to reign in the Paparazzi as well ?

....says "Kill Bond, NOW!"
The Swollen Goi...
Location:
Posts: 14343
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

Daltons chin dimple wrote:

Isn't Ca. considering something to reign in the Paparazzi as well ?

The Academy Awards?

I suppose California, itself, does a fair job of reining in the paparazzi. The paparazzi rarely seems to make it beyond the state line.

HI MY NAME IS GUS
Location:
Posts: 357
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

I thought Brad Pitt used to date Sandra Bullock.

Think of me as a megaphone directed at God's eardrum, my child.
Daltons chin dimple
Location:
Posts: 12800
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

Wouldn't surprise me. This was probably back when she was kooky and adorable.

....says "Kill Bond, NOW!"
The Swollen Goi...
Location:
Posts: 14343
Posted: 10 years 48 weeks ago

HI MY NAME IS GUS wrote:

I thought Brad Pitt used to date Sandra Bullock.

Twenty years from now, we'll be able to look back on this year and say, "Hey, remember that time Sandra Bullock beat out Helen Mirren and Meryl Streep for an Oscar?"

When she accepts the Oscar, I hope she accepts it like this: