Movies: 1135
Comments: 67725
Members: 718
Online: 0 Guests: 641
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display.inc on line 1684.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_display::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_display.inc on line 1684.
  • strict warning: Declaration of date_plugin_display_attachment::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 33.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 24.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 25.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 26.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 28.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 29.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 30.
  • warning: Attempt to modify property of non-object in /home/corona/public_html/modules/date/includes/date_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 31.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_user::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/user/views_handler_field_user.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment_username::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 48.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 699.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 584.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 584.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_style_default.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 61.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 61.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/corona/public_html/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • : preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/corona/public_html/includes/unicode.inc on line 345.
  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 32.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/corona/public_html/modules/views/views.module on line 823.
  • strict warning: Declaration of content_handler_field::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/corona/public_html/modules/cck/includes/views/handlers/content_handler_field.inc on line 170.
film news

Paramount is thinking about Paranormal Activity 2

Posted by Patrick Sauriol on Sunday, October 25, 2009

It comes at no surprise that Paramount Pictures was thinking of a sequel to Paranormal Activity sometime after the movie made it's $11 million dollar promotion and advertising budget back. Now that the film has emerged as the number one film in the land and stands a good shot at making $100 million domestic, the very first official mention from Paramount about a possible Paranormal Activity 2 has been heard.

"We have the rights on a worldwide basis to do Paranormal 2 and we're looking to see if that makes some sense," said Paramount chairman Brad Grey to the Los Angeles Times. Unfortunately that was all the Times printed from Grey on the matter. How much talk have they've had within Paramount and will Oren Peli, the film's writer/director, be involved in the sequel? Will it follow up on the ending we saw in Paranormal Activity or go off in a different bent and tell a different story with different characters?

One very telling point that would indicate why Paramount is thinking of PA2 has to do with owning the domestic and worldwide rights if the studio wants to make a sequel. When Paramount paid $300,000 for the domestic distribution rights for Paranormal Activity they didn't buy the international rights. My guess is that the studio is waiting to see how well the movie resonates in the international markets before deciding how soon to put Paranormal Activity 2 into production. If the original does big business outside of the States you'll likely hear the official announcement from Paramount very soon.

-The Los Angeles Times.
KingVoyeur
Location:
Posts: 1601
Posted: 12 years 5 weeks ago

Can't they ever just let something be? For once give us a self-contained story that isn't tarnished by dragging it out endlessly, trying to explore and explain every little aspect of the evil.

Honey bunches.....of death!
Jakester
Location:
Posts: 5753
Posted: 12 years 5 weeks ago

Like Blair Witch 2 this will suck.

Richard Gozinya, Harold Snatch and Wilbur Jizz. Together we are the law firm Gozinya, Snatch and Jizz.
Col_Matrix
Location:
Posts: 313
Posted: 12 years 5 weeks ago

I beg to differ, plenty of hauntings left to be explored. The possibilities are endless, if maybe the main theme of the sequels could be the way they film it. Movies like this are mostly cool because even though we know they're fake, they pretend to be "real" documentaries. Blair Witch 2 was so horrible because it strayed from the filming-style of the original. I was happy with Paranormal Activity, though from what I have heard people are not liking it. Why's it making so much money then?

"You think we can smell them coming?"
mckracken
Location:
Posts: 965
Posted: 12 years 5 weeks ago

The title Paranormal Activity isnt specific to the events in this movie, it could very well be another house, with another couple.

I would love to see "the entity" ramping things up a few notches, also while this movie was definitly good and scary, Blair Witch Project, Quarantine and Cloverfield lost all their effectiveness once they came to the small screen (DVD) and I honestly dont think Paranormal Activity will be any different.

I would like Paramont to try to deliver an intelligent, well-crafted sequel rather than not to try at all... if it DOES suck, its totally on them, the movie going audience wont buy it just like they didnt buy Blair witch 2: book of Shadows

but in the rare event that they can make something decent.. hey, I'm all for that.

mckracken
Location:
Posts: 965
Posted: 12 years 5 weeks ago

Col_Matrix wrote:

I was happy with Paranormal Activity, though from what I have heard people are not liking it. Why's it making so much money then?

you heard negative things about this movie Matrix? I havent! Everybody who was seenit has heaped tons of praise on it.

its not the scariest movie of all time as the producers want you to thing but it does create a pretty good scare. personally I didnt lke the husband when he was antagonizing the entity, I thought the guy was a total idiot trying to provoke it like he did but thats just me.

the1andonly
Location:
Posts: 2
Posted: 12 years 1 week ago

WHO WOULD EVEN CARE ABOUT THIS MOVIE IF THE ONE AND ONLY GOD ALMIGHTY IN THIS MODERN DAY REALITY FINALLY GOT ON WORLD WIDE TV FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE! WOULD ANY BODY BE INTERESTED IN THAT? OR IS EVERY SINGLE SOUL-I-TARY HUMAN ON THIS GOD FORSAKEN PLANET SO JEALOUS AND ENVIOUS OF THAT CAT IN THAT HAT CHANNELING AND PANELING THE ONE AND ONLY THAT EVERYBODY IS WILLING AND NOT EVEN .00001% ANY CHILLING TO GET THEIR NEXT 222 LIFETIMES OF SHARE AND UTTER SLIME AND UN SHINE BY THE MORE THAN OBVIOUS ONE AND ONLY DE-VINE AND SUBLIME! AND PETER SWEETER JUST THINKS NONE OF YOU WANT TO LOOK GOOD LIKE A CIGARETTE SHOULD IN YOUR NEXT 222 LIFETIMES! AND YOU DONT WANT ANY MONEY OR HONEY! AND YOU ALL WANT TO BE KNOWN AS GRAYS! JUST LIKE BRAD GRAY! FOR STRAYING AWAY IN THE MODERN DAY FROM THIS MORE THAN ANY OBVIOUS FILLET! WOULD ANY OF YOU READING THIS KISS OF BLISS A. AGREE OR B. DISAGREE WITH ME THE ONE AND ONLY THRU SWEET-E PETE-E! AND ANY BODY READING THIS KISS OF PURE UNADULTERATED BLISS THAT DOES NOT WRITE US AND IG-KNIGHT US WITH THE MORE THAN ANY OBVIOUS RIGHT ANSWER TO THE UNIVERSES GRANDEST OF ALL DANCERS AND PRANCERS! THEN YOU WILL BE GETTING! AND THERE WILL BE NO BETTING! BUT FO SHO FO SHO FO SHO A MORE THAN ANY HELL OF A LOT OF REGRETTING! MORE THAN ANY OBVIOUSLY FROM THAT GOD ENERGY THAT IS THE ONE DOING ALL OF THOSE NOW WOW KAPOW HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE GIFTS AND RIFTS THRU THE SKIN OF SWEETER PETER PALPIN! WOULD YOU A. AGREE OR B. DISAGREE AND IF YOU DISAGREE THEN WHO IS DOING ALL OF THOSE HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE GIFTS AND RIFTS THRU SWEET-E PETE-E IF ITS NOT ME THE ONE AND ONLY GOD ALMIGHTY IN THIS MODERN DAY REALITY! AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO ALL OF YOU IN THIS MODERN DAY IF YOU DONT ANSWER MAY! HELL OOO HOWW ARRRR YOUUUUU AT theknightofthelight@gmail.com

charmed i hope for your own sake! not for petes sake or for gods sake who you all know fo sho fo sho fo sho is not a fraud! and this goes for all of you that run or own or work at this web site! that do not shine bright with me the one and only for all of you disdain for sweete pete-e helll ooooooooooooo how arerrr youuuuuuuu